TCWT Blog Chain: Change and More Change

This month’s TCWT chain had the following prompt:

“What are your thoughts on book-to-movie adaptions? Would you one day want your book made into a movie, or probably not?”

Well. Books are hard to turn into movies. They’re two completely different mediums. Books can be as long or as short as you want (though there are guidelines for particular genres, they aren’t hard-set rules), while movies generally have to stay around an hour to two hours. (Unless it’s Lord of the Rings, of course.) In other words, when books are turned into movies, you have to figure out how to fit the entire story into just an hour and a half.

And because they’re so different—because books tell stories with words, while movies tell stories with images and sounds—sometimes it can be difficult to tell the same story exactly the same way.  Hence, things are changed.  I think those changes are important to make a good book-to-move adaption, but they have to be the right changes.  Some changes I’ve seen in movies just don’t make sense.

The Lightning Thief, for example.  A lot of things were different between the book and the movie.  Some things were big, like the fact that the actors were all around sixteen, while the characters in the book were twelve.  I’m not sure why that was done, maybe just because they wanted to use older actors.   It wasn’t really that big of a deal, though, right?  Did it screw up the story?  Eh.  Then there were changes like the fact that a lot of Riordan’s humor, which is part of what made the books so awesome, was strangely lacking in the movie.  And if it was there, it wasn’t really memorable, because I can only think of one joke from the movie, and it wasn’t even that good of one.

One of my favorite parts of the book was the scene where the camp bully, Clarisse, picks on Percy and tries to shove his head in the toilet.  Was that in the movie?  No.  And for good reason.  While it was good in the book, if it was in the movie, it would have slowed down the pace of the entire movie, and that wouldn’t have been very good.

There were other changes, like the fact that the book characters Clarisse and Annabeth were combined into one character in the movie.  I personally didn’t like that because it prevented Annabeth from fulfilling the expectations I had of her, after reading the books.  At the same time, I could see why it was done, because it might slow down the movie if there were too many characters to keep track of.

It’s hard, I think, to turn a book into a movie.  On one hand, as I’ve said, it’s hard (if not outright impossible) to turn a book into a good movie without changing anything.  Ender’s Game is proof of that.  Not a whole lot was changed out of the movie, as far as I can remember, but there was so much story, crammed into so little time, that it took away the emotion.  The book made me cry when I finished it (yes, it really did), but the movie just seemed kind of…flat.  My parents think the movie would have been better if they split it up into two parts—but then they’d have to add something to give a good climax for the first part, and what would that mean?  Change.

On the other hand, it’s hard to change anything and not have all of the fans freaking out.  How many people disliked Lightning Thief? Yet, if you look at it for it’s own, it’s not a bad movie, really.  I very strongly disliked the movie Howl’s Moving Castle because it changed so much from the book.  Some things were minor, but they probably annoyed me the most.  Calcifer was blue.  Was it that hard to make him blue?  And Sophie’s hair did not stay grey, it turned red again! Come on!  And what happened to Howl’s hair turning ginger? That scene was funny.  I’ll admit, I haven’t seen the movie in years, and I really only remember the things that annoyed me, so I can’t tell you if the movie was actually any good or not.

Anyway, I restate my point.  Change is important, but it has to serve a purpose.  Random changes done-just-because-it-can-be-done do not endear fans to the movie.

And to answer the last part of the question, I’d love to see my books turned into movies.  I’d be pretty nervous to see them, but I’m curious how other people would interpet my characters and how differently they’d see them than I do.

5th –
6th –
7th –
8th –
9th –
10th –
11th –
12th –
13th –
14th –
15th –
16th –
17th –
18th –
19th –
20th –
21st –
22nd –
23rd –
24th –
25th –
26th –
27th –
28th –


TCWT Blog Chain: And in the Morning, I’m Makin’ Waffles!

I almost completely forgot about this blog chain.  Great way to start off my first post for it… Thankfully, I was reminded the day before I was supposed to have my post, and not the day after.  So I’m not late!  Yet.

Anyway, for those who don’t know what this chain is, here’s a link to the page.


Anyhow.  This month’s prompt was:

What kinds of published books would you like to see more of? 

Oh boy.   What a big question.  So here’s a list.

  • One of the things I want to see more of is female characters.  I guess this goes along with what a lot of other people have been saying—having more diversity in books—but I want to see more diverse female characters in the fantasy genre. I mean, how many different personalities, different combinations of flaws and strengths, different backstories, different goals, do you see with male characters?  Why can’t females have just as much diversity and differences?  Not just as a main character, either, but playing any role in the story.  Villain, sidekick, any of that.
  • More fairy tale retellings.  Yes, yes, I know, there already is a lot, but… they’re strangely fascinating.  I’ve never really been able to write one before—at least not very well—but I love reading them.
  • Less love triangles. Don’t get me wrong, I like a little romance. I can fangirl over my favorite ships. However, I prefer the kind that’s just a subplot, has a happily ever after at the end, and doesn’t thrown in any love triangles—especially if the sole purpose of them is for tension and suspense.  There really are other ways to create suspense, I promise.  And, well, I really do like happily ever afters.  I know they’re not very realistic—but when I read about “true love”, I can pretend that it really does exist and that maybe one day I’ll find some kind of Prince Charming, even though I feel darn near invisible to the male gender in social situations.  That sounds super cheesy, I know.  But I have a right to sound cheesy when I want to, thank you.
  • Anyway.  The last thing is different settings. I know there’s lots of different settings in different genres, but I mostly read fantasy, so the setting I see the most of is one usually loosely based off of medieval Europe. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with that; it’s a fun time period and place. Almost every single one of my novels has a setting like that, too.  But I think it would be fun to see more fantasy novels set in completely different style settings. How about, say, a big fantasy that happens in the middle of Africa? Or Russia?  And not something modern, either.
    I want to write something like this, myself. I have German heritage and I’m sort-of learning the language, and I think it would be awesome to learn more about the culture and maybe use it for a story. I’ll be honest and say the only reason I haven’t done this yet is because I really…don’t know how to do the research.

And…to end my little list, here’s the other blogs in the chain.

May 5th –
May 6th –
May 7th –
May 8th –
May 9th –
May 10th –
May 11th –
May 12th –
May 13th –
May 14th –
May 15th –
May 16th –
May 17th –
May 18th –
May 19th –
May 20th –
May 21st –
May 22nd –
May 23rd –
May 24th –
May 25th –
May 26th –
May 27th –
May 28th –
May 29th –
May 30th –